Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Potential regulatory effects of CXCR2 and CPEB1 on cardiac cachexia

Yang Li1, Congyu Zhang2, Qian Tong1, Xiaoxing Feng1

1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University; 2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China.

For correspondence:-    

Accepted: 17 March 2021        Published: 30 April 2021

Citation: Li Y, Zhang C, Tong Q, Feng X. Potential regulatory effects of CXCR2 and CPEB1 on cardiac cachexia. Trop J Pharm Res 2021; 20(4):709-714 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v20i4.7

© 2021 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effect of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2) and cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding protein 1 (CPEB1) which are linked to inflammatory and cellular senescence, on cardiac cachexia.
Methods: Early and advanced stages of cardiac cachexia were established in mice using exogenous injection of single doses of growth differentiation factor 11 (GDF11, 3.0 and 6.0 mg/kg, respectively). The expressions of CXCR2 and CPEB1 were assayed using immonohistochemistry and Western blotting.
Results: Following two weeks of GDF11 injection, cardiac tissue mass was reduced by 23 and 39 % in early and advanced stages cardiac cachexia, respectively, in mice. Histology showed progressive loss of cardiac muscle and cardiomyocyte shrinkage in early stage, with extensive cardiac muscle wasting and disruption of cardiac arche structure in the advanced stage. Immunohistochemistry and Western blotting showed that CXCR2 was 4.6 times overexpressed in the initial stage of cachexia, but was restricted to only 2.4-fold overexpression in advanced stage of cardiac cachexia. The results showed that CXCR2 and its higher expression in early stages of cardiac cachexia prepared the cardiac microenvironment for vast changes during which its expression was limited. There were 2.2-fold and 5.5-fold higher expressions of CPEB1 in early and advanced stages of cardiac cachexia, respectively, indicating its role in cardiac muscle wasting and remodelling in cellular senescence.
Conclusion: CXCR2 overexpression modulates extensive cardiac muscle loss in cardiac cachexia, thus affording a strategy for the management of this pathological condition.

Keywords: Cardiac cachexia, Growth differentiation factor 11 (GDF11), C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2), Cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding prot

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates